Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 08:04:10 -0400
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 05/30/2012 04:31 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson
> <robbat2@g.o> wrote:
>> No, the last mock conversion is still live and updating fairly
>> often: 
>> http://git-exp.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=exp/gentoo-x86.git;a=summary
>
>> 
> Since you seem to know most about this project, can you give a
> short summary on what *you* think are hard blockers for the
> migration?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dirkjan
> 

The 6 hours it takes to clone the repo.

- - Aaron
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iF4EAREIAAYFAk/HXjoACgkQVxOqA9G7/aB2DwD+JqdcMJDIfu30Oht8rB6H/pMY
Wr1RjhujZvVGIDQG55QA/jPlsWh3c8El7HjxzhjoCNIPkV1Vj3b7VZVc/D6y6oq9
=FxGY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Replies:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Peter Stuge
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Alexey Shvetsov
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Rich Freeman
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Duncan
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Robin H. Johnson
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Dirkjan Ochtman
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
Re: [PATCH eutils] Move remove_libtool_files() from autotools-utils for wider use.
Next by date:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.