Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Martin Schlemmer <azarah@g.o>
To: Nicholas Wourms <dragon@g.o>
Cc: Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@××××.se>, Gentoo-Dev <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] updated gentoolkit with echangelog modification
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:10:11
Message-Id: 1051560373.4507.45.camel@nosferatu.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] updated gentoolkit with echangelog modification by Nicholas Wourms
1 On Mon, 2003-04-28 at 15:29, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
2
3 > Frankly, I found the signal->noise ratio to be quite
4 > unacceptable. The volume was way to high to be able to
5 > sensibly keep up with discussions. Too much stuff which
6 > belonged on other lists was discussed here instead of
7 > development. Also, I was concerned that this might not be
8 > appropriate to discuss here since the decision was made by
9 > my superiors and without any prior notice. I was worried
10 > that bringing this up here would be overstepping my bounds.
11 > However, I agree with Aron that community feedback would
12 > be useful.
13 >
14
15 I think the big issue was that -dev was unmanageable at some
16 stage, so we rather just did discussions there. And then
17 -core because -dev/-user 8)
18
19 It was anyhow not really set in stone by anybody in authority.
20 I really do not think anybody would have moaned or noticed (:P)
21 anyhow if you posted to -dev, as long as you do not flame
22 somebody ;)
23
24
25 Regards,
26
27 --
28
29 Martin Schlemmer
30 Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop/System Team Developer
31 Cape Town, South Africa

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature