Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@g.o>
Subject: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 21:51:26 +0200
Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2012, 18:33:41 schrieb Michał Górny:
> On Wed, 23 May 2012 14:42:37 +0200
>
> Michael Weber <xmw@g.o> wrote:
> > *if you still read this* *wow*
> >
> > Please discuss my arguments and come to the conclusions to
> > RESO/WONT-FIX "testing git-cvsserver", make a "clean cut" and remove
> > this bug from the blockers of "[TRACKER] portage migration to git".
>
> Kill it! And while we're at it, kill ChangeLogs as well!
>
> /me hides...

with "git log some-cat/foo" we will have it automagically.

--
0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317  3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134
Attachment:
signature.asc (This is a digitally signed message part.)
References:
Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michael Weber
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
-- Michał Górny
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Next by thread:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver
Previous by date:
comprehensive eclass checking in repoman
Next by date:
Re: Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.