Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Tobias Klausmann <klausman@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 10:17:01 +0100
Hi! 

On Wed, 04 Nov 2009, Ryan Hill wrote:
> Is there any interest in allowing certain packages to be stabilized by the
> maintainer without going through the arch teams?  I always feel guilty when i
> file stabilization bugs for app-doc pkgs.

I think for bugs which only install passive files (i.e. stuff
that doesn't "power" anything else), Keywording can be done by the
maintainer. Pure doc files (like selfhtml) are in that category.

Naturally, if a new version needs a new doc processing toolchain,
things are a bit different.

But as far as alpha is concerned: go ahead.

Regards,
Tobias

PS: I considered allowing the doc processing stuff, too, but it's
astoundingly easy to break some fairly important stuff just my
messing up DTDs.

-- 
printk("Pretending it's a 3/80, but very afraid...\n");
	linux-2.6.19/arch/m68k/sun3x/prom.c


Replies:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Petteri Räty
References:
[RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Markos Chandras
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Christian Faulhammer
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ben de Groot
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Joseph Jezak
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
-- Ryan Hill
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Next by thread:
Re: Re: [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations
Previous by date:
Re: 2.6.31 stable plans
Next by date:
Re: a pragmatic approach to FEATURES [was FEATURES use or misuse?]


Updated Nov 21, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.