Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Shutdown of berlios
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:02:30
Message-Id: CAGfcS_kn5a3m7mjTsq3u5uiRvecdfhZOqyoWs=SV2pHgk-zFFg@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Shutdown of berlios by Alec Warner
1 On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
2 > We can't force people who write Gentoo specific software to host w/us
3 > (that would be silly.) If upstream is dead then take a tarball and
4 > clone it into a git repo; nothing is stopping you.
5
6 While that should certainly happen if you want to continue with
7 development, if the concern is that we don't lose the tarballs for the
8 packages in the tree the easiest solution is for the maintainers to
9 grab a copy and stick it in their dev web space and point the SRC_URI
10 there. Unless the project was already in git that is likely to be
11 easier than trying to re-create the same tarballs in some other repo
12 like github.
13
14 That is, assuming the current fashion is to host stuff like this in
15 dev web space. It seems like that comes and goes, but in the absence
16 of anything better it probably will do and beats having the files just
17 vanish some day.
18
19 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Shutdown of berlios "Diego Elio Pettenò" <flameeyes@g.o>