Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: Are tags just sets?
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:00:43 +0100
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 10:54:44 +0200
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
> > I'm highly doubtful that there's any real need for different kinds
> > of repository-provided sets. We especially don't want sets to be
> > code...
> 
> Simple things like getting a list of packages which own a particular
> file (for rebuilds) or grepping a variable are useful to users.

That's something done by sets as provided by the package mangler, not
something done by repository-specified sets.

> For example, the x11 overlay provides a set to rebuild the xorg server
> modules after an update.

That's just a list of package specs. The user then says "only the ones
of these that I have installed" by the way the set is used.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Are tags just sets?
-- Michał Górny
References:
Are tags just sets?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Are tags just sets?
-- Michał Górny
Re: Are tags just sets?
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Re: Are tags just sets?
-- Michał Górny
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Are tags just sets?
Next by thread:
Re: Are tags just sets?
Previous by date:
Re: Are tags just sets?
Next by date:
Re: Re: RFC: split up media-sound/ category


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.