Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Paul de Vrieze <pauldv@g.o>
Subject: Re: binary packaging
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 11:26:08 +0200
On Wednesday 06 October 2004 00:05, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Ick. The way to do this that won't break things is to decide upon a set
> of USE flags, apply them at a global level and then make a set of
> binaries for said combination. Then, give it a name and stick a file
> named __make.conf__ in the binaries directory. There's probably some way
> to do this neatly using the stuff in GLEP 29 if you really want.
>
> Incidentally, you'd to do the same for CFLAGS that you do for USE. For
> certain CFLAGS you can't safely mix combinations, it's an all or nothing
> thing.

Which exactly shows why binary packaging can be a bitch and the reason that 
even debian must use releases. Source based can mix and match, but binaries 
are never that flexible.

Paul

-- 
Paul de Vrieze
Gentoo Developer
Mail: pauldv@g.o
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net
Attachment:
pgpl38wzbungF.pgp (PGP signature)
References:
binary packaging
-- Philippe Trottier
Re: binary packaging
-- Ciaran McCreesh
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: binary packaging
Next by thread:
removal of app-office/siag (and its dependency mowitz)
Previous by date:
Re: shell-tools herd?
Next by date:
Re: non-Gentoo stuff in our CVS


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.