1 |
субота, 1. липень 2006 13:02, Luis Medinas Ви написали: |
2 |
> On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 12:29 +0200, George Shapovalov wrote: |
3 |
> > sci-physics - many packages were listed, so a candidate, but I did not |
4 |
> > get a clear impression of how "finalized" the idea was and how many |
5 |
> > people finally decided to stay behind it. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> There's a problem with this. A few packages i listed could be part of |
8 |
> sci-crystallography too. If we start this new category we should had a |
9 |
> few more related packages otherwise we will have this category empty. |
10 |
> Another thing is who is really insterested in creating this sub-herd ? |
11 |
> cryos and markusle are still in ? If not there's a possibility to mentor |
12 |
> a candidate and start this thing for real. |
13 |
Well, kugelfang has expressed an interest (in a "me too" way) just recently on |
14 |
irc. So, what about interested people create a bug (blocking that tracker |
15 |
138049) and polish it up there (the packages that should go in that |
16 |
category/stay elsewhere, who does what, etc..)? This is exactly why I said I |
17 |
did not get a clear idea of what was the conclusion about this category :). |
18 |
|
19 |
If this bug does not get created then it would mean there is not enough |
20 |
interest of course. Another possibility is a herd, with packages staying |
21 |
where they are. The procedure can be similar, or whatever discussion medium |
22 |
suits interested people the best.. |
23 |
|
24 |
There were suggestions (for the packages and an interested user, although I |
25 |
understood that he does not have time or persistent internet connection right |
26 |
now) on gentoo-science list. If the bug gets created I can post the relevant |
27 |
fragments to it.. |
28 |
|
29 |
George |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |