Archives
Archives
| From: | Torsten Veller <ml-en@××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] Re: Individual developer signing | ||
| Date: | Fri, 11 Dec 2009 16:35:10 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20091211163254.GA10718@veller.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Individual developer signing by "Robin H. Johnson" |
||
| 1 | * "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>: |
| 2 | > > BTW: About a third of the Manifests are signed [1]. We didn't improve |
| 3 | > > [1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~tove/stats/gentoo-x86/Manifest/Manifest.png |
| 4 | > > [2] http://dev.gentoo.org/~tove/stats/gentoo-x86/Manifest/ratio_2005.png |
| 5 | > > [3] http://dev.gentoo.org/~tove/stats/gentoo-x86/Manifest/Manifest2.png |
| 6 | > Nice graphs. Can you show them over a larger timespan? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Yes, I recreated them from cvs and the keys available now. |
| 9 | [1] and [3] show the progress for the last year and [4] the history since May |
| 10 | 2004. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | - In Jan 2008 the transition to Manifest2 was finished and all |
| 13 | signatures were dropped. |
| 14 | - I guess [2] didn't "require-cross-certification" while gnupg now |
| 15 | defaults to "require-cross-certification". |
| 16 | So the number of valid signatures in [4] is lower than in [2]. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | After the "Manifest2"-break the level is lower. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | [4] http://dev.gentoo.org/~tove/stats/gentoo-x86/Manifest/Manifest-all.png |
