Robin H. Johnson wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 04:22:02PM +0200, Tiziano M?ller wrote:
>> And this is where the second GLEP comes in:
>>     http://dev.gentoo.org/~dev-zero/glep/glep-xsd.html
> Don't remove the DTD DOCTYPE line. Leave it there.
> Let simple tools be able to use the DTD to validate the well-formedness,
> then upgrade to the XSD to check the actual semantics of the file.
> 

Very good point, thanks. But the changes of GLEP 46 can't be validated
without allowing the "status" attribute for the toplevel maintainer. But I
guess we could do it as long as it's documented (and commented) correctly.



-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list