Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Sebastian Pipping <webmaster@××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:40:51
Message-Id: 4A8F68AE.1070405@hartwork.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Diff between Funtoo and Gentoo as an overlay by Nikos Chantziaras
1 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
2 > There seems to be a bit of (minimal) duplication between pure-funtoo and
3 > sunrise:
4 >
5 > app-office/thinking-rock-bin
6 > dev-tex/mimetex
7 > x11-drivers/xf86-video-nouveau
8 >
9 > And since sunrise is the most popular overlay, it might be a good idea
10 > to also omit packages found in sunrise.
11
12 Sunrise ebuilds are subtracted already.
13
14 The reason app-office/thinking-rock-bin ends up in pure-funtoo is that
15 newer version of existing ebuilds are also taking into account:
16
17 Sunrise: 2.0_pre2-r2
18 Funtoo: 2.0.1
19
20 That's why app-office/thinking-rock-bin-2.0.1 is in pure-funtoo.
21
22
23
24 Sebastian

Replies