Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:56:17
Message-Id: 20120220190313.57892cfa@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] About gcc-4.6 unmasking by Pacho Ramos
1 On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
2 Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
5 > preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
6 > stabilization)?
7 >
8 > I have read hardmask message but it simply explains that it's masked for
9 > testing purposes :-/
10
11 Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes
12 people's systems unbootable.
13
14 I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions.
15
16
17 --
18 fonts, gcc-porting
19 toolchain, wxwidgets
20 @ gentoo.org

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking "Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn" <chithanh@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>