From: | "Tomáš Chvátal" <scarabeus@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-dev] RFC: package.use.stable.mask |
Date: | Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:04:57 |
Message-Id: | 200910102204.51253.scarabeus@gentoo.org |
1 | Hi, |
2 | lately I spoted that quite few packages have optional parts bit unstable (KDE |
3 | parts, boinc [i wont stable it until the cuda is, i wont do the work explained |
4 | bellow :)], kipi,...). |
5 | I really don't like the shebang about doing -r1 and -r50 so we keep 2 |
6 | revisions where one is stableable and second is not. |
7 | So how about having this nice file (topic), it quite self-explainable by the |
8 | name. |
9 | Also syntax would be same as for package.use.mask and same goes for placement |
10 | :] |
11 | |
12 | Cheers |
13 | |
14 | Tomas |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: package.use.stable.mask | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: package.use.stable.mask | Joshua Saddler <nightmorph@g.o> |