| 1 |
Quoting Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Wed, 2004-04-07, 14:29:47 -0400, in |
| 4 |
> <200404071429.47124.vapier@g.o>, Mike Frysinger |
| 5 |
> <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > On Wednesday 07 April 2004 02:51 pm, Meir Kriheli wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > Question is: Can there be more than one arch in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS in a |
| 8 |
> > > single system (like: "~amd64 ~x86") ? Is such state legal at all ? |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > should it be done ? no ... does it work ? yes ... users do it ... |
| 11 |
> > should it be supported ? no ... |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I disagree. Hypothetical situation: one box serving /usr to several |
| 14 |
> hosts of different ARCHes. Maybe we should look improving support for |
| 15 |
> such a situation. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Serving /usr for serveral hosts of different ARCHes, like in the example, this |
| 18 |
would imply that fe. X would be compiled for x86, but the amd64 ARCH using the |
| 19 |
/usr won't be able to use that X version (in 64 bit) imho. . If i'm correct then |
| 20 |
why use the same /usr for different ARCHes. I don't feel that this provides |
| 21 |
improvement to the system. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
"I am not bound to please thee with my answers." |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
--------------------------------- |
| 28 |
| Jochen Maes | |
| 29 |
| Developer ppc/java | |
| 30 |
| Gentoo Linux | |
| 31 |
| http://dev.gentoo.org/~sejo/ | |
| 32 |
--------------------------------- |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives