1 |
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:05:54 +0400, Maxim Koltsov wrote: |
2 |
> Hi devs, |
3 |
> I got a request to add Leechcraft (http://leechcraft.org/) to the |
4 |
> portage tree. Leechcraft is modular internet client with many |
5 |
> plugins. |
6 |
> Main problem with it is that it has very few (less than 5, i suppose) |
7 |
> active maintainers, and is needed by very limited amount of users |
8 |
> (mainly friends of project lead). So, i want to use gentoo-dev ML as |
9 |
> tool to 1) advert Leechcraft to larger audience and 2) ask Gentoo |
10 |
> developers and users: is it worth to be in tree? |
11 |
> If there are 5 votes for Leechcraft and no unfixable complaints from |
12 |
> other devs, i will start adding Leechcraft to tree. |
13 |
> Here you can see existing ebuilds and other info: |
14 |
> http://code.google.com/p/rion-overlay/source/browse/#hg%2Fnet-misc |
15 |
> |
16 |
> http://code.google.com/p/rion-overlay/source/browse/eclass/leechcraft.eclass |
17 |
> Contacts of the project lead and supposed package maintaner in gentoo |
18 |
> (with me as proxy): d34df00d@××××××.ru (XMPP). |
19 |
|
20 |
There are no restrictions based on "popularity" of a package being |
21 |
added to the portage tree. As a matter of fact, if even only you, |
22 |
yourself, used the package it is still valid to add to the tree provided |
23 |
someone is adequately maintaining it. You do get that privilege as a |
24 |
Gentoo Developer - the meta-distro is yours. |
25 |
|
26 |
-Jeremy |