| 1 |
Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 2 |
> Andrew Gaffney wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 12:38, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> I think Chris's primary concern is one of "Tell us whats up before it |
| 6 |
>>>> happens." |
| 7 |
>>> why should he care ? some Gentoo guys take catalyst and produce |
| 8 |
>>> stage4s directed at certain applications |
| 9 |
>> He cares because they're basically extending the roll of releng without |
| 10 |
>> it being under releng's control. I know I'd be annoyed if they release a |
| 11 |
>> x86 stage4 and then *I* gets bugs, but I know absolutely nothing about |
| 12 |
>> it. Having 2 projects doing almost the same thing is just going to |
| 13 |
>> confuse users. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> As somebody's already mentioned, the embedded project releases GNAP and |
| 16 |
> has a releng liaison. There's no reason the seeds project couldn't also |
| 17 |
> have a releng liaison, which seems to resolve the main dispute here. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
That's not the issue. The issue is that there should *already* be a releng |
| 20 |
liason, but nobody from releng seems to know anything about this project. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Andrew Gaffney http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/ |
| 24 |
Gentoo Linux Developer Installer Project |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives