Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 01:54:02
Message-Id: 20120220200050.55b36c69@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking by Alexandre Rostovtsev
1 On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:30:40 -0500
2 Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:03 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
5
6 > > Grub is the only blocker. I don't want to unmask something that makes
7 > > people's systems unbootable.
8 > >
9 > > I'm also out of ideas and open to suggestions.
10
11 > gcc is slotted. Is there any reason why we can't simply make grub depend
12 > on a working slot of gcc and set CC appropriately in the ebuild?
13
14 We have no way of forcing an ebuild to be built with a particular version of
15 GCC. This is on purpose, and there are both technical and sociological
16 reasons for it.
17
18 What we can do is take some kind of action if the compiler is 4.6, such as
19 die with a message to use grub-static instead.
20
21
22 --
23 fonts, gcc-porting
24 toolchain, wxwidgets
25 @ gentoo.org

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking Xavier Miller <xavier.miller@×××××.org>