Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>, "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@×××××.org>
Cc: kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr, gentoo-dev@g.o, manson@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 14:58:14
Message-Id: 015e01c2a5dc$6738a970$c00c460a@pro.tl.thomcorp.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? by "Thomas T. Veldhouse"
1 OK -- the culprit is NOT Rodney. Rodney is the only person who has made an
2 entry into the changelog. The real culprit seems to be Daniel Robbins. ;)
3 I apologize to Rodney for implicating you as the person who has done the
4 damage to portage.
5
6 Tom Veldhouse
7
8 ----- Original Message -----
9 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@×××××.net>
10 To: "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@×××××.org>
11 Cc: <kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr>; <gentoo-dev@g.o>; <manson@g.o>
12 Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 8:09 AM
13 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
14
15
16 > Rodney is the port maintainer for portage. He obviously needs to get some
17 > sleep and test in ~ first!
18 >
19 > Tom Veldhouse
20 >
21 > ----- Original Message -----
22 > From: "Aurélien Gouny" <aurelien@×××××.org>
23 > To: <veldy@×××××.net>
24 > Cc: <kdolkas@××××××××××××.gr>; <gentoo-dev@g.o>;
25 <manson@g.o>
26 > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:53 AM
27 > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ?
28 >
29 >
30 > >
31 > > Thomas T. Veldhouse said:
32 > > > Rodney,
33 > > >
34 > > > Please remask this (portage-2.0.45-r6) ASAP.
35 > > >
36 > > > Tom Veldhouse
37 > > >
38 > >
39 > > I'm not Rodney but I've made a 'emerge rsync' and there is no portage to
40 > > be updated, it seems to have been masked.
41 > >
42 > > Thanks guys for warning,
43 > > --
44 > > Aurélien Gouny
45 > > ______________________________
46 > > Email: aurelien@×××××.org
47 > > Web: http://aurelien.gouny.org
48 > >
49 > >
50 > >
51 >
52 >
53 > --
54 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
55 >
56 >
57
58
59 --
60 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage-2.0.45-r6 SERIOUSLY fucked up ? Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>