On Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:32:41 -0400
"Bruce A. Locke" <blocke@...> wrote:

Ah someone shoot me... I found the source of the problem...  Whoever did
the original -r3 BitchX ebuild forgot about the makefile, etc patch we
have in the files directory.  I checked in a copy of the patch for -r3
while trying to debug stuff and thats probably why it started building for
other people after I complained. :(  With this patch BitchX now detected
esound fine.

Sorry everyone...

> On 23 Sep 2001 17:14:18 +0200
> Mikael Hallendal <micke@...> wrote:
> 
> > Btw, what idiot would name the package so that 0.2.22 is not newer
than
> > 0.2.5? 
> 
> I'm assuming this is the case because the test for 0.2.5+ fails in the
> BitchX configure script and the authors website shows 0.2.8 as the most
> recent version.  Either way BitchX isn't building for me with 0.2.22.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bruce A. Locke
> blocke@...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@g.o
> http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bruce A. Locke
blocke@...