From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Cc: | ssuominen@g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete | ||
Date: | Thu, 28 Jun 2012 08:28:06 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120628102629.4f3aaff6@pomiocik.lan | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete by Samuli Suominen |
1 | On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:12:34 +0300 |
2 | Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
3 | |
4 | > The logic in prune_libtool_files is not perfect[1]. |
5 | |
6 | Define 'perfect'. |
7 | |
8 | > To clarify: |
9 | > |
10 | > Use `prune_libtool_files --all` instead of plain |
11 | > `prune_libtool_files` if you don't test the package with the USE |
12 | > flags. |
13 | |
14 | Sounds like abuse of '--all' to me. It's like calling 'rm -r' for |
15 | single file... |
16 | |
17 | > [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/421197 |
18 | |
19 | -- |
20 | Best regards, |
21 | Michał Górny |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] prune_libtool_files is NOT a direct replacement for, example, find "${D}" -name '*.la' -delete | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |