| 1 |
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 10:10 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 03/10/05, Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I'd prefer if the patch was left out for amd64 users, or included via a |
| 4 |
> > use flag. reiser4 isn't yet stable or proven on amd64. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> A quick search found this quote: "The topic in channel #gentoo-amd64 |
| 7 |
> on irc.freenode.net has said "Reiser4 is evil" for more than a year." |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> However http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_AMD_64 and the forum threads it |
| 10 |
> links to seem to suggest that people are successfully using reiser4 on |
| 11 |
> amd64 with recent kernels? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
Yes it's true because reiser4 isn't ready for AMD64 atm. There are a |
| 14 |
couple of users that tried reiser4 and they got nothing more than data |
| 15 |
corruption because reiser4 is unstable. |
| 16 |
For somehow reiser4 isn't in the stable kernel. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Luis Medinas <metalgod@g.o> |
| 20 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~metalgod |
| 21 |
Gentoo Linux Developer: AMD64,Printing,Media-Optical |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives