1 |
Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 03:48:53PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: |
3 |
>> Lionel Bouton wrote: |
4 |
>>> There are already good resources (http://gentoo-wiki.com/CFLAGS_matrix |
5 |
>>> was mentioned to me by robbat2) but they may not be advertised enough. |
6 |
>> Most of the info on that page is wrong. |
7 |
> The items on there that note breakages are reasonably correct. |
8 |
> -fvisibility=hidden and -ffast-math DO cause breakages. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> -ftree-loop-linear likewise is broken on GCC4.1 last I checked. |
11 |
|
12 |
I thought he wanted flags that broke upgrading between GCC 3.4 and 4.1. |
13 |
tree-loop-linear wasn't in 3.4. If you want flags that just break |
14 |
stuff with 4.1 you can include -ftree-vectorize. |
15 |
|
16 |
>>> I'd like to propose a paragraph to the GWN editor which presents some |
17 |
>>> gotchas and good references on the subject. |
18 |
>> Honestly, the only good reference is the Safe CFLAGS page. |
19 |
> The objective here was mainly to point out some things that users are |
20 |
> doing that are causing breakages, leading to bugs that are ultimately |
21 |
> marked INVALID after much tracing. |
22 |
|
23 |
Like using CFLAGS not on the Safe CFLAGS page? ;) |
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
Monsieur Spanky wrote: |
27 |
> no way will our documentation link to gentoo-wiki.com |
28 |
|
29 |
It's not documentation, it's the GWN, which has linked to gentoo-wiki |
30 |
before. |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
--de. |