1 |
On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:30:20 +0400 |
2 |
Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> В Срд, 14/10/2009 в 22:12 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет: |
5 |
> > On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200 |
6 |
> > Peter Hjalmarsson <xake@×××××××××.net> wrote: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > > Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this |
9 |
> > > topic? |
10 |
> |
11 |
> > A week isn't old. ;) I'll add it once the flu and homework let up for a |
12 |
> > minute. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Why don't you like Jeroen's suggestion? It looks more much more sane. |
15 |
> Currently dbus ebuild allows installation of package upstream never |
16 |
> intended to be installed on end-user stations and this is bug in ebuild |
17 |
> that should be fixed. And I don't think it's good idea to workaround |
18 |
> this bug with yet another USE flag which, when enabled, will still allow |
19 |
> users to install broken package on the system. Not speaking that this |
20 |
> USE flag could be easily overused. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> Twice build (one for installation and one for testsuite run) is really |
23 |
> not hard since dbus allows out of sources build (/me just checked this). |
24 |
|
25 |
I want a more general solution, as eva asked for in the bug. I also want a |
26 |
testing feature that allows more control than always on or off. Other |
27 |
packages already employ USE flags for testing or debug features that |
28 |
shouldn't normally be enabled (even w/ USE=test). I'd just like to make it |
29 |
consistent. |
30 |
|
31 |
But, that said, I'm happy to let the dbus guys what they want to do. |
32 |
|
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. |
36 |
gcc-porting, |
37 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |