Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE=qa-test
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:23:30
Message-Id: 20091017152342.4af88f51@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: USE=qa-test by Peter Volkov
1 On Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:30:20 +0400
2 Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > В Срд, 14/10/2009 в 22:12 -0600, Ryan Hill пишет:
5 > > On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 13:11:14 +0200
6 > > Peter Hjalmarsson <xake@×××××××××.net> wrote:
7 > >
8 > > > Sorry for reviving an old thread, but was there any progress on this
9 > > > topic?
10 >
11 > > A week isn't old. ;) I'll add it once the flu and homework let up for a
12 > > minute.
13 >
14 > Why don't you like Jeroen's suggestion? It looks more much more sane.
15 > Currently dbus ebuild allows installation of package upstream never
16 > intended to be installed on end-user stations and this is bug in ebuild
17 > that should be fixed. And I don't think it's good idea to workaround
18 > this bug with yet another USE flag which, when enabled, will still allow
19 > users to install broken package on the system. Not speaking that this
20 > USE flag could be easily overused.
21 >
22 > Twice build (one for installation and one for testsuite run) is really
23 > not hard since dbus allows out of sources build (/me just checked this).
24
25 I want a more general solution, as eva asked for in the bug. I also want a
26 testing feature that allows more control than always on or off. Other
27 packages already employ USE flags for testing or debug features that
28 shouldn't normally be enabled (even w/ USE=test). I'd just like to make it
29 consistent.
30
31 But, that said, I'm happy to let the dbus guys what they want to do.
32
33
34 --
35 fonts, Character is what you are in the dark.
36 gcc-porting,
37 wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature