Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Daniel Armyr <daniel.armyr@××××.se>
To:
Cc: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Several portage trees
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 02:13:13
Message-Id: 3EA9EA22.20509@home.se
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Several portage trees by "Robin H.Johnson"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 I went back and reread the post you mentioned. I feel this should go
5 into the developer docs. I have read them quite thouroughly, adn most of
6 ~ what you say IS mentioned there, but not in an accessible way. Perhaps
7 a before-you-submit-checklist at the end of the policy doc? Since you
8 obviously have quite specific preferences as to how you want the ebuilds
9 to look, stating these plainy and clearly would be nice.
10 //Daniel Armyr
11
12 | Go back and read my posting about why many ebuilds don't get into the
13 | tree.
14 | Subject = Re: [gentoo-dev] Ebuilds not getting in :(
15 | Date = Tue, 22 Apr 2003 15:36:55 -0700
16 |
17 | If you fix those issues, and fix that ebuild.
18 | Things to fix:
19 | add SLOT, add KEYWORDS, add IUSE, 'use foo' statement style, use PATCHES
20 | instead of patch+src_unpack, local variable declarations, unnessicary
21 | statement block in src_install, broken homepage URI, ALL documentation
22 | with the package should be installed (manpages and even the guys pgp
23 | key) , einstall instead of 'make install' and most importantly EBUILD
24 | CHANGELOG!!!!!
25 - --
26 =========================================
27 daniel.armyr@××××.se f00-dar@×××××.se
28
29 C118 KEVII Hall
30 1A Kent Ridge Rd S.119224
31 Singapore PGP@×××××××.edu
32 =========================================
33 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
34 Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
35 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
36
37 iD8DBQE+qeohhxtTUWLs2lERAgkJAJ9bmKRcyk0P8KA2TgsuJyrxHVgAogCePRJt
38 3B1LbN/rGqd60CH2+ThfsTk=
39 =r9lH
40 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
41
42
43 --
44 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list