Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship

Installation:
Gentoo Handbook
Installation Docs

Documentation:
Home
Listing
About Gentoo
Philosophy
Social Contract

Resources:
Bug Tracker
Developer List
Discussion Forums
Gentoo BitTorrents
Gentoo Linux Enhancement Proposals
IRC Channels
Mailing Lists
Mirrors
Name and Logo Guidelines
Online Package Database
Security Announcements
Staffing Needs
Supporting Vendors
View our CVS

Graphics:
Logos and themes
Icons
ScreenShots

Miscellaneous Resources:
Gentoo Linux Store
Gentoo-hosted projects
IBM dW/Intel article archive




List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o>
Subject: Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:37:17 -0700
On 14:05 Fri 13 Mar     , Michael Higgins wrote:
> I believe, rather, that the issue is the 'community' appears more like 
> a 'cabal' when the discussions take place on #IRC and therefore aren't 
> available in public archives.

This is kind of like saying: "I don't read the Gentoo forums, so 
everything that happens on the forums is a cabal." When you specifically 
choose not to participate in an entire method of communication, it's 
your choice to leave yourself out. A cabal is totally different -- it 
doesn't give you that choice by never even telling you there is a place 
where discussions happen.

> Even if they are, an IRC log is a *terrible* way to document an issue.

I agree. So is a mailing-list archive that is also never summarized. 
It's not the location that makes it a problem, it's the volume of 
information and the lack of a summary of important decisions or long, 
important discussions.

> You all get more closely knit, perhaps, yet appear to do more *in 
> secret*. There is *no way* to find out what is going on, without 
> becoming part of the problem... by asking, or lurking, on IRC. This is 
> bad.

I can't agree with your assertion that IRC is secretive, is a problem or 
is bad. I think completely the opposite in all cases. Secretive would be 
a closed IRC network that we didn't tell non-developers about or didn't 
allow them to join.

-- 
Thanks,
Donnie

Donnie Berkholz
Developer, Gentoo Linux
Blog: http://dberkholz.wordpress.com
Attachment:
pgpA3Vt6pGql8.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
-- Richard Freeman
References:
Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support )
-- Caleb Cushing
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
-- Thilo Bangert
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
-- Markos Chandras
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
-- Thilo Bangert
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
-- Donnie Berkholz
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
-- Michael Higgins
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
Next by thread:
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))
Previous by date:
Re: gentoo KVM images now available :)
Next by date:
Re: devs on IRC (was :Regen2 ( was QA Overlay Layout support ))


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Donate to support our development efforts.

Gentoo Centric Hosting: vr.org

VR Hosted

Tek Alchemy

Tek Alchemy

SevenL.net

SevenL.net

php|architect

php|architect

Copyright 2001-2007 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Email www@gentoo.org.