Archives
Archives
| From: | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 30 May 2008 16:43:25 | ||
| Message-Id: | 200805301743.15555.levertond@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? by flameeyes@gmail.com (Diego 'Flameeyes' =?utf-8?Q?Petten=C3=B2?=) | ||
| 1 | On Friday 30 May 2008 17:29:49 Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: |
| 2 | > This really is backward, solution-wise: you expect the "core |
| 3 | > application" to know enough of the plugins to link them together, but |
| 4 | > not enough to call their init functions... |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Why should it call their init functions, when a static object with a |
| 7 | constructor can do the job just fine? |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |