Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 08:21:53 -0800
On 03/08/2012 08:11 AM, David Leverton wrote:
> On Mar 8, 2012 3:29 PM, "Zac Medico"<zmedico@g.o>  wrote:
>> Something like DEPEND="foo bar" is also valid bash, and yet we don't
>> allow that either because "foo bar" does not contain valid dependency
>> atoms.
>
> There's a bit of a difference between caring about the value of a
> variable and caring about what syntax was used to assign it....

Maybe that sort of distinction truly makes a difference to some people, 
but to me it just seems like hair-splitting [1].

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivial_objections
-- 
Thanks,
Zac


Replies:
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ciaran McCreesh
References:
RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Alec Warner
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Ulrich Mueller
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Alec Warner
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- Zac Medico
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
-- David Leverton
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Next by thread:
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Previous by date:
Ebb (eb) was: Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds
Next by date:
Re: RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.