| 1 |
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 15:29:48 +0200 |
| 2 |
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 01/12/2010 12:23 AM, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 09:25:51PM +0100, Raaal Porcel wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> scarabeus told me that the eclass can't be removed until two years since |
| 7 |
> >> the deprecation date, so... |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> Removal of the eclass on 2012/01/11 |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Reasoning? Prior to env saving we couldn't particularly punt |
| 12 |
> > eclasses, but env saving is widely deployed now... |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > ~harring |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> At least my argument at the time was that better to be safe when the |
| 17 |
> benefit from removing old eclasses isn't that much. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Still, waiting another two years to be able to remove an eclass which |
| 20 |
itself hasn't been used in two years seems a little ridiculous. I can see |
| 21 |
waiting two years from when env saving went into stable, but that's passed |
| 22 |
already. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
wxlib.eclass was recently removed (accidentally) after being |
| 25 |
deprecated for just a couple months, and the world continued to revolve |
| 26 |
despite it. ;) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
fonts, looks like Christmas at 55 degrees |
| 31 |
gcc-porting, this latitude weakens my knees |
| 32 |
wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662 |
Archives