| 1 |
On 05/23/2012 01:00 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote: |
| 2 |
> El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 10:31 +0100, Markos Chandras escribió: |
| 3 |
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> El mié, 23-05-2012 a las 06:39 +1000, Michael escribió: |
| 5 |
>>>> On 2012-05-22 03:46, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: |
| 6 |
>>>>> On May 20, autools.eclass was changed to no longer inherit eutils, see |
| 7 |
>>>>> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/autotools.eclass?r1=1.133&r2=1.134 |
| 8 |
>>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>>> Relying on autotools.eclass for your eutils needs was always a terrible |
| 10 |
>>>>> idea, but a few ebuilds did it anyway. Those ebuilds are now *broken* |
| 11 |
>>>>> since they can no longer use epatch. See bug #416847 for an example. |
| 12 |
>>>>> |
| 13 |
>>>>> Check your ebuilds to make sure you inherit eutils in anything that uses |
| 14 |
>>>>> epatch! |
| 15 |
>>>>> |
| 16 |
>>>>> -Alexandre Rostovtsev. |
| 17 |
>>>>> |
| 18 |
>>>>> |
| 19 |
>>>>> |
| 20 |
>>>> Since eutils inherits multilib and user, the breakage extends beyond epatch. |
| 21 |
>>>> For example, I just saw bug #417153, where a user reported failed calls |
| 22 |
>>>> to enew{user,group}. |
| 23 |
>>>> |
| 24 |
>>>> |
| 25 |
>>>> |
| 26 |
>>> |
| 27 |
>>> The autotools.eclass change should probably be reverted until things are |
| 28 |
>>> properly checked I think (and I will do it tomorrow if nobody disagrees) |
| 29 |
>> |
| 30 |
>> It is far too late to do that. What is done is done. Let try and fix |
| 31 |
>> what is still broken |
| 32 |
>> |
| 33 |
>> Regards, |
| 34 |
>> Markos |
| 35 |
>> |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
> |
| 38 |
> But we still have no idea what kind of commands provided by eutils and |
| 39 |
> eclasses inheritted by it are now missing, epatch usage was fixes, |
| 40 |
> enewgroup/user will probably be done but... other missing commands could |
| 41 |
> still appear in the tree :| |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
I wrote a simple, stupid script just a moment ago. Please don't show it |
| 44 |
to anybody who knows how to write in Python :D |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
It shows all missing inherits, not just the ones causing failures, but |
| 47 |
it could prolly be adjusted to do that instead. |
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
Cheers, |
| 50 |
Kacper |
Archives