Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: tester@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 14:28:31
Message-Id: 20110308152635.3f357d66@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration by "Olivier Crête"
1 On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500
2 Olivier Crête <tester@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 20:47 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
5 > > Why does everyone assume it needs to be enforced? If user is
6 > > interested in protecting his/her data, he/she can simply use
7 > > https://. If he/she is not, there is no real reason to enforce
8 > > slower (and not always supported) SSL.
9 >
10 > Maybe it's not to protect the user, but to protect the Gentoo
11 > infrastructure.. And really, SSL has been supported by every browser
12 > for the last 15 years. And it is not in any way slow or slower than
13 > non-SSL.
14
15 If you really think you need to force all users to use SSL, thus
16 assuming they're unable to make their own decisions, why don't you
17 restrict bugzie access completely?
18
19 --
20 Best regards,
21 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration "Antoni Grzymała" <awaria@××××××××××.pl>