Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@...>
Subject: Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2010 17:38:34 +0100
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:04:45 +0300
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
> Whilst I do understand that these arches are understaffed and they
> can't keep up with the increased stabilization load like x86/amd64
> do, I still think that slow stabilization leads to an obsolete stable
> tree which I doesn't make sense to me after all.

Which does Gentoo care about more: slightly increased convenience for
most developers, or considerably increased inconvenience for users of
minority archs?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Markos Chandras
References:
Policy for late/slow stabilizations
-- Markos Chandras
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Next by thread:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Previous by date:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations
Next by date:
Re: Policy for late/slow stabilizations


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.