Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date.
GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists. c.f. bug 424647
On Sun, 27 Jun 2010 18:04:45 +0300
Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
> Whilst I do understand that these arches are understaffed and they
> can't keep up with the increased stabilization load like x86/amd64
> do, I still think that slow stabilization leads to an obsolete stable
> tree which I doesn't make sense to me after all.
Which does Gentoo care about more: slightly increased convenience for
most developers, or considerably increased inconvenience for users of
minority archs?
--
Ciaran McCreesh
|
|
