1 |
All, |
2 |
|
3 |
> Perhaps this is an argument for a git based portage tree? Master can |
4 |
> stay as the current status quo and anyone who wants to can maintain a |
5 |
> branch or fork which points to a slightly different subset of the tree? |
6 |
> |
7 |
|
8 |
I'm starting to put together a portage/stable server configuration for a large |
9 |
number of gentoo VM's that will eventually be hosted on a VMware ESX 4.1U1 |
10 |
cluster - with the goal of limiting major changes to once/year and otherwise |
11 |
only applying security/minimum necessary updates. I doubt it will be easy but |
12 |
I'm doing my best at it :) |
13 |
|
14 |
As part of that I'm maintaining on github several related repositories, |
15 |
including portage mask/use/config files, cluster management utilities, etc. |
16 |
|
17 |
https://github.com/deploylinux |
18 |
|
19 |
I've also started to document work on my blog: |
20 |
|
21 |
http://www.deploylinux.net/matt |
22 |
|
23 |
I'm not currently planning to utilize a separate overlay for packages/ebuilds, |
24 |
but it's not out of the question. |
25 |
|
26 |
I'd be happy to work with any other devs w/ similiar interests or production |
27 |
networks to manage.....github makes group development relatively easy. |
28 |
|
29 |
MattM |
30 |
-- |
31 |
Matthew Marlowe / 858-400-7430 / DeployLinux Consulting, Inc |
32 |
Professional Linux Hosting and Systems Administration Services |
33 |
www.deploylinux.net * matt@×××××××××××.net |
34 |
'MattM' @ irc.freenode.net |