1 |
On 12-03-2010 08:46:34 -0700, Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
2 |
> That said they were perfectly entitled to make the decision of not |
3 |
> wanting to maintain qt3 any longer. The only advice I can give is that |
4 |
> all disgruntled users and developers create a qt3 project and |
5 |
> adopt/unmask/re-commit the qt3 libraries for maintainers of packages |
6 |
> who need it. I doubt this will happen as this could have been done a |
7 |
> long time ago, but it's never too late. |
8 |
|
9 |
Didn't we have a graveyard thing/overlay somewhere some day? Some users |
10 |
might happily prefer to use stuff that's treecleaned, or removed due |
11 |
security issues. If removal of stuff would mean it's dumped in there it |
12 |
can be easily used by users and more easily readded later afterwards, if |
13 |
need arises. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Fabian Groffen |
18 |
Gentoo on a different level |