Archives
Archives
| From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> |
|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o |
| Subject: | [gentoo-dev] About upstreams appending additional CFLAGS when building with some configure options |
| Date: | Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:25:06 |
| Message-Id: | 1314818665.6632.3.camel@belkin4 |
| 1 | I won't be able to reply to this thread for now, but would like to ask |
| 2 | about how to handle cases like: |
| 3 | https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381355 |
| 4 | |
| 5 | Until now, I usually opted to trust upstreams and don't touch FLAGS they |
| 6 | set (except cases like Werror and so.), but I am not sure if maybe I |
| 7 | should drop that CFLAGS :-/ |
| 8 | |
| 9 | What do you think? Please also take care I doubt upstream wouldn't ever |
| 10 | accept that change and, then, we should carry it forever. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | Thanks a lot for your help |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] About upstreams appending additional CFLAGS when building with some configure options | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] About upstreams appending additional CFLAGS when building with some configure options | "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> |