Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>
Subject: Re: kernel-mod.eclass addition + clean up
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 19:46:44 +0100
On Tue, 02 Nov 2004 16:40:31 +0100
Henrik Brix Andersen <brix@g.o> wrote:

> This is where the question above (does portage use ${KV} internally?)
> becomes important. If portage uses ${KV} internally it can not be
> supplied by an eclass.
> 
> Could one of the portage devs please shed some light on this?

A quick grep for KV and ExtractKernelVersion doesn't show any real usage
except for check_KV in ebuild.sh, but that function isn't used in
portage itself, so if any ebuilds/eclasses are using it they could be
changed to the eclass implementation in theory.

Marius

-- 
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub

In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be
Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
Attachment:
pgpoK5ygg5Dnq.pgp (PGP signature)
References:
kernel-mod.eclass addition + clean up
-- Henrik Brix Andersen
Re: kernel-mod.eclass addition + clean up
-- Daniel Drake
Re: kernel-mod.eclass addition + clean up
-- Henrik Brix Andersen
Re: kernel-mod.eclass addition + clean up
-- Daniel Drake
Re: kernel-mod.eclass addition + clean up
-- Henrik Brix Andersen
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: kernel-mod.eclass addition + clean up
Next by thread:
Re: Thanks :)
Previous by date:
Re: Ugly, nasty code in tetex.eclass
Next by date:
Re: Re:


Updated Jun 17, 2009

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.