| 1 |
On Thursday 03 October 2002 12:54, Sebastian Werner wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Sure but's that's not the correct way I think. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
I know it isn't, that's why its dangerous. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > ps. you can of course give your own init script a different name and |
| 9 |
> > change /etc/inittab accordingly. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> And this not, too. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The correct way is not to change this script. Maybe you could file a but to |
| 15 |
have some things put in their own init scripts instead of in this file, but |
| 16 |
this file is very dependant on your baselayout, so it should be changed with |
| 17 |
it. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> To patch my system is one, and to find a global solution some other. I |
| 20 |
> don't see why don't split this big file as I said. This is the easiest way |
| 21 |
> and you will found all init scripts in /etc/init.d - much cleaner. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Some parts of the script can be split, some shouldn't. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Paul |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
-- |
| 28 |
Paul de Vrieze |
| 29 |
Junior Researcher |
| 30 |
Mail: pauldv@××××××.nl |
| 31 |
Homepage: http://www.devrieze.net |
Archives