From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds | ||
Date: | Wed, 07 Mar 2012 20:46:30 | ||
Message-Id: | 20120307204428.3118997e@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] RFD: EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller |
1 | On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 21:41:02 +0100 |
2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > (I really hope for a constructive discussion here. So, if you want |
4 | > to comment that all of the above proposals suck and GLEP 55 is much |
5 | > superior, then please open a new thread for it.) |
6 | |
7 | I think if you want a constructive discussion, then you should ignore |
8 | the previous Council's decision and reconsider all the solutions that |
9 | have been presented. |
10 | |
11 | -- |
12 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |