1 |
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 09:05:48 +0300 |
2 |
Eray Aslan <eras@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Comments on how to proceed? Is it OK for a virtual to list a package |
4 |
> which is in an overlay in RDEPEND? |
5 |
|
6 |
The way || ( ) dependencies are defined means doing so doesn't cause |
7 |
any problems. |
8 |
|
9 |
Having said that, overlays can always supply their own version of the |
10 |
virtual package if they prefer. It's not ideal, but it does mean that |
11 |
overlays aren't subjected to the whim of whoever's handling the virtual |
12 |
in the main tree. |
13 |
|
14 |
-- |
15 |
Ciaran McCreesh |