1 |
On 03/01/12 12:45 PM, Duncan wrote: |
2 |
> Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 03 Jan 2012 10:53:45 -0500 as excerpted: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Has the LFH been updated?? Googling seems to say no, as the last mod |
5 |
>> seems to have been in 2004... |
6 |
> |
7 |
> That was covered here in the last discussion. The FHS and LSB are |
8 |
> getting updated too, with the people driving the update being the very |
9 |
> same people, the fedora/redhat folks behind udev/udisks/upower/dbus/ |
10 |
> systemd/etc, with gnome as well now talking about a "gnomeos" that |
11 |
> integrates and requires the whole set, plus X (or whatever the X |
12 |
> successor is called, I forgot ATM) and gnome, of course, so that future |
13 |
> gnome will assume systemd, etc, as well. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
FHS, thank you. I didn't think I had that acronym right... |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
OK, well, if this is becoming the official standard then we will |
20 |
definitely need to adhere to it; I guess it's just a matter of when and |
21 |
what contingency/update plans we want to use to do it.. |
22 |
|
23 |
... if Gentoo's installed on a system (regardless of platform, and |
24 |
leaving out the Prefix installs), the filesystem is up to gentoo right? |
25 |
ie, there wouldn't be a need for a particular platform to stick with |
26 |
FHS-2.3 would there? Once we migrate to FHS-3.0, we can migrate all |
27 |
archs and profiles at the same time? |