1 |
Simon Stelling wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Edgar Hucek wrote: |
4 |
> > I know my tools but not necessarly the normal user who wanna use gentoo |
5 |
> > and is ending frustrated. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> If the users are too lazy to read the documentation, why should we care |
8 |
> about them? |
9 |
|
10 |
Because we risk that Gentoo may receive the "user-UN-friendly" label and |
11 |
become irrelevant in the long run? I know it ain't gonna happen, but still. |
12 |
|
13 |
Both Edgar and you have some valid points. He refers mostly to the out-of-box |
14 |
experience, which includes compiling GNOME and its dependencies at the install |
15 |
time. With USE="accessibility" enabled, which makes perfect sense for people |
16 |
with disabilities. And then the first-ever Gentoo installation breaks on the |
17 |
speech-tools and festival. |
18 |
|
19 |
How would *you* feel in such case? |
20 |
|
21 |
You OTOH bring to the table a fact that developers shouldn't be that much |
22 |
concerned with the stabilization/testing of packages before new release of |
23 |
installation media. But new releases *ARE* targeted specifically at new users |
24 |
and it's them who suffer the most. Next to it is the reputation of Gentoo and |
25 |
its developers. Edgar's call was targeted mostly at releng and QA teams, who |
26 |
should poke developers to decrease number of similar problems. |
27 |
|
28 |
I maintain a bunch of Debian/sparc, Debian/i386, Gentoo/amd64, Gentoo/x86, |
29 |
Solaris/sparc, Ubuntu/i686 boxes and mind you, out-of-box experience at |
30 |
install time means A LOT. |
31 |
|
32 |
More respect to the users => more respect to Gentoo. |
33 |
|
34 |
Regards, |
35 |
Wiktor Wandachowicz |
36 |
|
37 |
PS. I'm already on the CC list of bug #116030 for the same reasons, but |
38 |
I've been mostly quiet because I do know my tools ;) But OTOH I've been |
39 |
already running Gentoo for a while.... |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |