| 1 |
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:23:17 +0800 |
| 2 |
Ben de Groot <yngwin@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 24 June 2012 21:56, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On 2012-06-24 18:34, Ben de Groot wrote: |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> We at qt@ have been discussing this on and off. We would like to |
| 8 |
> >> see a linguas.eclass happen, because already now we start having |
| 9 |
> >> code duplication. So instead of this duplication of code between |
| 10 |
> >> qt4-r2 and cmake-utils eclasses, why not put this into a separate |
| 11 |
> >> linguas.eclass that both can inherit? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Actually, I was just thinking, since we are talking about two |
| 14 |
> variables and a few lines of code, maybe it would be better to add |
| 15 |
> this to base.eclass? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That would change its API and result in possible lot of broken ebuilds. |
| 18 |
Not to mention that base eclass currently doesn't require adding |
| 19 |
additional phase functions to actually handle what it sets. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Best regards, |
| 23 |
Michał Górny |
Archives