| 1 |
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:53:50 +0100 |
| 2 |
Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 18:47:17 -0400 |
| 5 |
> "Aaron W. Swenson" <titanofold@g.o> wrote: |
| 6 |
> > I second the allowing dots in USE flag names. Definitely would be |
| 7 |
> > helpful for declaring version related USE flags. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> You know you won't be able to mention such flags in the base profile, |
| 10 |
> right? At least not for a year or more, until the base profile's eapi |
| 11 |
> can be set to something other than 0. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Could you point me to at least a single program not supporting dots |
| 14 |
in useflags? My quick check shows that all PMs handle them well, quse |
| 15 |
and euse as well. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The only backwards-compat issue I see is repoman complaining. But this |
| 18 |
can be changed easily. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Michał Górny |
Archives