| 1 |
sön 2001-10-14 klockan 23.34 skrev Karl Trygve Kalleberg: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 16:37:23 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Blue Lizard <webmaster@×××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > bugzilla _could_ handle this, but while it is technically ready enough |
| 6 |
> > our development team is in no way prepared to handle the influx of new |
| 7 |
> > users that would find it a pain in the neck to use. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Then we find something that's easier to use. We really want this to |
| 10 |
> further Gentoo development, not hamper it. I do not think our current |
| 11 |
> system with sporadic mails to the gentoo-dev (and sometimes |
| 12 |
> gentoo-ebuild!) list is good enough. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
I don't think that anyone thinks that gnome-dev a good solution for |
| 15 |
bugreporting. (After all it should be a developer-list for |
| 16 |
devel-discussions). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I think that we should start using a bug-tracking system and that we |
| 19 |
should start doing so soon. As I've said before, Bugzilla is really |
| 20 |
powerful but can also be a large step for new users. However, this is |
| 21 |
with the default-interface, we could do our own interface that's easier |
| 22 |
to use. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
Someone also mentioned roundup (http://roundup.sourceforge.net/). I |
| 25 |
tried to get it running on my Gentoo-machine but it didn't want to play. |
| 26 |
Someone (and me) should give it another try. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
IMHO, we can choose either as long as it works. I also think that we |
| 29 |
should use this system for our "todo"'s, in other words, start using the |
| 30 |
bug-tracking system for what we currently uses Dev-wiki. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I'm not sure about Roundup but bugzilla can also be used for handling |
| 33 |
ebuilds (instead of gentoo-ebuild-list). |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Regards, |
| 36 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 41 |
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader |
| 42 |
CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden |
Archives