Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Paweł Hajdan
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:52:12
Message-Id: 4BAA5134.4000900@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item by Ben de Groot
1 On 3/24/10 6:35 PM, Ben de Groot wrote:
2 >> All valid concerns about text already included in the news item have been
3 >> addressed. We don't need to include any unofficial recommendations.
4 >
5 > I'll take that as a yes then, you are indeed disregarding the concerns
6 > and recommendations of your fellow Gentoo developers.
7 >
8 > CC'ing devrel because this is getting out of hand.
9
10 I think it's a purely technical issue. The arguments against Python 3
11 are mostly in the form "I don't feel it's ready". If it can't be
12 resolved on the list (some people want Python 3, some don't), shouldn't
13 the council decide?
14
15 "The elected Gentoo Council decides on global issues and policies that
16 affect multiple projects in Gentoo."
17
18 Paweł Hajdan jr

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Python 3.1: Stabilization and news item Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever@g.o>