| 1 |
On Monday, September 12, 2011 15:19:29 Nathan Phillip Brink wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 03:55:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > as for no-multilib systems, "lib64" will be the same, and "lib" will be |
| 4 |
> > symlinked to "lib64". this will be easier i think to share files between |
| 5 |
> > multilib and non-multilib 64bit systems. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Isn't this slightly more complicated than it needs to be? Why not just |
| 8 |
> use /lib and no symlink for no-multilib 64-bit systems? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
all the 64bit binaries have /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 encoded in them, so |
| 11 |
/lib64/ must exist on the system. |
| 12 |
-mike |
Archives