Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
Subject: Re: RFC: devqawarn()?
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 12:51:19 +0200
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:44:47 +0300
Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@g.o> wrote:

> On 1.9.2011 12.03, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > A quick idea. Right now eclasses sometimes do API changes and start
> > yelling at users merging ebuilds using outdates APIs. This often
> > means users start filling bugs about outdated ebuilds requiring
> > maintainers either to ignore that or start updating old ebuilds
> > retroactively.
> > 
> > Maybe we should add some kind of devqawarn() function to
> > eutils.eclass, which would trigger special QA warnings only when
> > ebuild is merged by a developer? This could be triggered e.g. by
> > some kind of voluntary make.conf setting.
> > 
> 
> What's wrong with eqawarn that's already provided by eutils?

The first paragraph?

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Attachment:
signature.asc (PGP signature)
References:
RFC: devqawarn()?
-- Michał Górny
Re: RFC: devqawarn()?
-- Petteri Räty
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: RFC: devqawarn()?
Next by thread:
Re: RFC: devqawarn()?
Previous by date:
Re: RFC: devqawarn()?
Next by date:
Re: RFC: devqawarn()?


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.