Re: [gentoo-dev] fix binary debug support, part elevenity billion + 1

[Ned Ludd]

On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 09:41 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Ned Ludd wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-06-08 at 06:49 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> >
> >>Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Wednesday 07 June 2006 19:12, Alec Warner wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I would be more concerned with convincing the rest of the developers.
> >>>>adding crap in base profile.bashrc will affect 99% of users, so it
> >>>>better be friggin correct and useful, otherwise you will piss a ton of
> >>>>people off.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>versus the people who are really annoyed that such support hasnt yet been
> >>>integrated into portage proper ?
> >>>
> >>>yes, from the portage side of things, it may be a pita to implement
> >>>per-package env ... but from the user side of things, it's a huge help
> >>>-mike
> >>
> >>My e-mail was basically worded as to say "Solar paste your crap to this
> >>ML."
> >
> >
> > Alright...
> >
> > tail -n 6 /usr/portage/profiles/uclibc/profile.bashrc
> >
> #for conf in ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do
> > #       if [[ -r /etc/portage/env/$CATEGORY/${conf} ]]; then
> > #               . /etc/portage/env/$CATEGORY/${conf}
> > #               break
> > #       fi
> > #done
>
> Ideas on multipile sources?
>
> Aka, I want all these env things enable for kde-base/* but for
> kde-base/foo

-for conf in ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do
+for conf in default ${PN}-${PV}-${PR} ${PN}-${PV} ${PN}; do

Call it 'default' ?


>  I want extra stuff ( or to negate things ), it looks like
> this only sources things once?

yep.

> Could we define a stacking order here and let them stack?

Could remove the break;

 
> >> Is there any reason you need package.env in portage proper as
> >>opposed to bashrc?
> >
> >
> > Nope.. bashrc is the only way to access the variables in a way that
> > is the most friendly to the bash side of things.
> >
>
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
Gentoo Linux

-- 
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list