-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 23-07-2010 11:37, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:30:02 +0200
> Thomas Beierlein <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>> interesting. I did not know that an ebuild can use-depend on
>>>> itself. Good to know.
>>> No, not good. It doesn't make any sense.
>> Can you give some reasoning for that?
> It's entirely unclear what deps upon self actually mean. Some people
> use them to say that a package needs to be installed before it can
> install itself. Thus, things like:
> DEPEND="|| ( myself myself-bin )"
> So a dependency upon myself[foo] would probably mean "I need
> myself[foo] to be installed before I can install myself", not "I need
> the foo flag to be set on myself".
In this case the dependencies are clear. They're not pretty, but they're
> In any case, abusing DEPEND isn't a mechanism for implementing use
> requirements. You should use the mechanism that's designed for use
> requirements to do use requirements, which means waiting for EAPI 4
> and pkg_pretend, or just follow existing policy and pick one in the
> case of a conflict.
Abusing depend is a good way to do this, until we get better tools. I
have to agree with Brian's proposal and say that in this particular
case, the best solution is required_use and not pkg_pretend.
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----