Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog g
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 03:34:55
Message-Id: pan.2012.01.20.03.33.45@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.ebuild glibc-2.13-r2.ebuild ChangeLog g by Zac Medico
1 Zac Medico posted on Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:39:12 -0800 as excerpted:
2
3 > Maybe it would be enough to add a suggestion about --exclude in the
4 > --newuse section of the emerge man page? I don't think this is confusing
5 > enough to qualify for an interactive suggestion.
6
7 I'd find that exactly right, here.
8
9 However, it could be argued that the various boilerplate "handholding"
10 we're already doing has set the precedent. That's actually where I got
11 the idea, after all. But I'm not going to argue it. I'd be more
12 inclined to argue that we're already over the line in some places, and
13 that if users really need this, they really should consider a different
14 distribution as gentoo's obviously not right for them.
15
16 So yeah, a mention of --exclude in the manpage's --newuse discussion
17 sounds quite balanced, to me. =:^)
18
19 --
20 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
21 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
22 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies