Gentoo Logo
Gentoo Spaceship




Note: Due to technical difficulties, the Archives are currently not up to date. GMANE provides an alternative service for most mailing lists.
c.f. bug 424647
List Archive: gentoo-dev
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Headers:
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
From: Panagiotis Christopoulos <pchrist@g.o>
Subject: Re: Re: Restabilizing MIPS
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 20:15:50 +0200
On 11:20 Mon 15 Nov     , Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>  I don't want to stop you, but you are relatively new to the "real"
> keywording business.  amd64 at a point had over 30 members and could
> not work on the backlog in a timely manner.  Think about
> ...

I completely agree. I don't know even what's the status of ~mips in the
main tree. It would be better, I believe, to start working on the ~mips
system/world set, then start stabilizing only toolchain and/or
@base-system packages. Please don't start keywording/stabilizing random
packages without taking into *serious* consideration what Christian
wrote. I was here when we dropped the stable mips keyword, I don't want
to see it happening again. 

-- 
Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist )
    ( Gentoo Lisp Project )
Attachment:
pgpCscVAVoTUO.pgp (PGP signature)
Replies:
Re: Re: Restabilizing MIPS
-- Matt Turner
References:
Restabilizing MIPS
-- Matt Turner
Re: Restabilizing MIPS
-- Jeremy Olexa
Re: Restabilizing MIPS
-- Matt Turner
Re: Restabilizing MIPS
-- Christian Faulhammer
Navigation:
Lists: gentoo-dev: < Prev By Thread Next > < Prev By Date Next >
Previous by thread:
Re: Re: Restabilizing MIPS
Next by thread:
Re: Re: Restabilizing MIPS
Previous by date:
Re: Disabling auto-bumping of active Python version
Next by date:
Re: EAPI versioning of files in profiles


Updated Jun 29, 2012

Summary: Archive of the gentoo-dev mailing list.

Donate to support our development efforts.

Copyright 2001-2013 Gentoo Foundation, Inc. Questions, Comments? Contact us.